Damian M. Schloming ideas and information

Naomi Wolf on rape: "...ours is increasingly an age of geopolitics by blackmail."

This website is to allow me to present intelligibly my thoughts and insights on various social, political, historical and even scientific issues I've been studying in the past two years. 

Some of which I have background knowledge of due to having been involved with and interested in various political movements many years ago. 

My political viewpoint leans towards libertarian, except that I am not completely happy with the way some of them think. Libertarians want limited government and civil liberties. As a matter of principle, that is excellent. But then libertarians seem to suffer from this ingrained bias of Western Culture that you can somehow intellectually decide that government "should be" a certain way and then the perfect society can then be achieved by some legislative body sitting down and crafting some written rule decreeing that that is how society is to be from now on.

 

Actually, I think government and the larger society it is embedded in is more like some kind of living beast that you can train or that can morph in one direction or another, but it can't be so easily manipulated or changed as we think. Written rules don't have the exact effect they literally intend, but instead enforcement of the rules and all sorts of other considerations regarding government bureaucracies results in all sorts of ripple effects or unintended consequences. As a result, the most free society does not necessarily result from the one with the nicest and most free sounding written constitution or constitutional rights guaranteeing liberty. A very good example of this issue is the liberal Warren Court expanding all sorts of fifth amendment procedural and technical criminal protections for defendants. Liberals saying they want to do this might be arguing this is to help the poor. The opposite is the truth. This is to help defense attorneys, and why is that a bad thing? Because criminal procedures and technicalities of the liberal Warren Court only resulted in defendants having protection IF they could hire an expensive enough attorney to do a good enough job PRESSING them. Public defenders are part of the corrupt court system, they deliberately do a bad job so as to make sure well heeled defendants find it worth their while to pay extra. Huge sentences ALSO give well heeled defendants more incentive to pay extra. Thus, defense attorneys representing rich criminal defendants have a vested interest in maintaining the strict sentencing policies responsible for Mass Incarceration. Furthermore, there was a law school bubble which burst, and now law schools are doing poorly because lawyers are not finding it worth their while to spend so much money on a law degree. Fact of the matter is, those liberal Warren Court protections indirectly increased legal fees for defense attorneys, thereby contributing to the upward pressure on college tuition and law school tuition, simply because the amount of money attorneys could make from a law degree made it more worthwhile. 

It also is true that the regulatory state increased in many other ways, increasing demand for attorneys in other spheres besides the criminal justice system. But I am going to talk about the criminal justice system here for now to use it as an example.

This is just one example showing how a policy that, examined in the most superficial way you think it's designed to help criminal defendants overall in the long run has the exact opposite effect. Because these protections are ones that only can be accessed by those with the money to pay for top dollar attorneys. And, it isn't always necessarily related to the facts of the case. The attorney usually has an incestuous relationship with everyone else in the court system, so much so that basically if you pay the right attorney enough money, you will get off because he is friends with all the judges and prosecutors, and parole officers, etc.

And for me to say that could lead to others thinking it is rather awful to have a court system so incestuously corrupt. Except, these are all nice people who know each other and court systems have ALWAYS been like this, more or less. And they always will be this way. Government is incapable of being perfect. Understanding its inherent imperfections such as this are necessary when it comes to avoiding passing laws which interact with such a culture in a way to produce very bad outcomes.

 

After all, we have always had government and, for some reason, it would appear if we always have had it, that is because we need it. The inner workings of government are so awful, you discover after you observe it, it can easily lead many to think we should just abolish it. But, given that that is impossible, the best alternative is to understand it as inherently flawed, and realistically think of how to make things "the least bad."

This is what I have thought for a long time, yet only recently have I stumbled across some law professors who subscribe to a movement called "legal realism." It turns out they think exactly the way I do, and see the same flaws in our society (or in the thinking of popular culture which leads to wrong-headed policies in our legal system) that I see.

Oddly enough, they seem to describe themselves as leftists yet they are not the kind of ordinary mainstream leftist most people would understand to be "of the left." Which is strange because I never would have thought of myself as a liberal -- but not a conservative either. But maybe this is because of certain strands of liberalism I have been exposed to which are quite awful. 

In any case, why categorize oneself? As I study and learn more about society, I like to share various insights and not limit myself to any one "box" or "category" that I pigeonhole myself into.

Theory 1. Prostitution Ring that coerced gay men into sexual slavery.

2005-2009 up to submitting report to Family Justice Center. 

That, at least, was the general tenor of any and all information gay men selectively fed to me between 2005 and 2008, and early 2009, and note these are the years when I was working at Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary, Resolute Management, and if you look at the Table of Contents of the report I submitted to policemen dealing with prostitution at the Family Justice Center, you'll see in Exhibit E me referring to this man, Stefano, who had been online stalking me, at times threatening me, and who had "infiltrated" my workplace and appeared to be trying to pressure me into becoming his live-in lover. 

This story is long and complicated. Suffice it to say, the company handled the whole matter extremely dishonestly, almost as if they figured they didn't need to show even a modicum of respect for the law. Bullying would suffice.

The report also reflects the high numbers of gay men who had told me about organized underground groups of gay men who encourage gay men to become "bugchasers" and encourage them to engage in unsafe sex and get infected with HIV, and while many of them voluntarily do so, often some men would be raped (date rape drugged) and involuntarily infected with HIV. And, indeed, date rape drugging is something the bar, ramrod, is well known for. The fact that HIV drug prices have been set exorbitantly high would automatically create such perverse incentives for various gay activist organizations bankrolled by Big Pharma to go out of their way to enable such situations. We do have a huge amount of corruption in this country with so many activist organizations acting as stealth lobbyists for business.

And here is a copy of the "Table of Contents" of the report I submitted to the Family Justice Center: 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DfVTATXTucVGlScWtXYWlzbzg/edit?usp=sharing

Note the information on alleged prostitution and abuse of children which was completely not followed up on.

Theory 2. Prostitution Ring that had something to cover up, and deliberately manipulated me into going to the police in order to have an excuse to abuse me as a "rat" and a "snitch." 

Summer and Fall of 2009 -- this new theory was based on certain "expert information" from at least three gay men who were allegedly trying to be "helpful" and "set me straight" with regard to why the Family Justice Center would suddenly cease communication with me. In particular, there was this one James from Provincetown, who I met at this hotel there which, while inexpensive, I later found out was known to be one of the sleaziest hotels in Provincetown. He told me a bunch of baloney about the mafia which steered me towards the following theory written in an email to my landlord regarding how this was all about a prostitution ring that denied the mafia its "rightful take" in certain prostitution situations and wanted to target me for reasons rather absurd. 

I guess I should point out, I'd have to have been a really gullible person to believe this without question. And I'm not. It would be more accurate for me to say, I was very intimidated at the time, and this theory was a "consensus view" imposed one me by those I was talking to at the time. It also fit enough of the evidence so it was not unreasonable for me to conclude. Furthermore, I already HAD sufficient evidence of criminal mischief so it was obvious SOMETHING was going on. And this was a coherent story to tell in the process of presenting the evidence.

In addition to which, I was also at the time feigning gullibility and acting -- in the words of someone else -- like someone who "doesn't know 'nuthin'" in an effort to lull these individuals harassing me into a false sense of security which I hoped would cause them to let their guard down in a way that would allow me to collect better evidence on them and get more information from them. The letter I wrote to my landlord, which I will quote from, also included an attachment WITH some of the "proof of bizarre irregularities" I had captured during this period of playing dumb with a lot of people. Most importantly, I was able to prove that few email exchanges between me and men harassing me had been made to "disappear" from my sent mail folder on manhunt in a way that could only have been done either by a computer hacker or by an IT professional working directly on the manhunt.net server. 

Still, this "theory" was part of a letter I wrote to my landlord, and was meant for his consumption only, and shouldn't necessarily be assumed to be something I really believed at the time. At the time, I was cognizant of the need to avoid making too many theoretical "leaps of faith" or speculation without hard evidence backing it up, simply because of how often I was reminded by a lot of people of how confident they felt they could cover it all up by saying I was crazy. Hence, the desire to avoid sounding "confused" led me to sound extremely gullible in the matter. Repeating a story I could prove was fed to me by others took the pressure off me. And, indeed, there are plenty of conversations I had with people -- some documented -- where I outright say "you can't cover this up by saying I am crazy for simply repeating what I was told by others -- you'd have to say it is everyone I am talking to who is crazy instead." 

In any case, I will post a copy of this letter I wrote to my landlord at the time, where you can see I am repeating this theory, though I am also ascribing it to others. Before I post the letter, however, I wish to draw attention to a few things.

Second paragraph of P. 2 I write:

These conclusions may not be 100 percent accurate simply because the information I base them on is incomplete. There may be more going on that I do not know about. I can only say that I have compulsively documented every situation I was involved with, and I have an extensive "contemporaneous papertrail" that backs up my contentions regarding this matter. -- P. 2

I also describe it as a "conspiracy to commit murder" by deliberately feeding me information about sleazy goings on at this bar, Ramrod, and encouraging me to go to the police about them. However, I later attribute the motives as having to do with some sort of embezzlement scheme going on, and I later write that: 

The reason they cannot murder me now is that, should I be found dead, several people would come forward with information proving that these individuals had a motive to murder me, and thus a murder investigation would be the very mechanism by which these individuals would be exposed. Thus, they have been forced to resort to other tactics, besides murder, to try to squash me. P. 1

And I even note the seeming contradiction: one of those involved in this alleged "conspiracy to commit murder" by feeding me inside information ALSO was the same one who encouraged me to protect myself from such murder by forwarding my information and documentation to several others, all so he could continue to get money and favors to help "manage" the situation. 

After I was set up on false charges, apparently a hit was put on my life. Then it was taken off. Oddly enough, it was one of my so-called "friends" who had fed me information and urged me to go to the police who was the one who told me about the hit put on my life, and how it was later taken off after I had emailed all of my documentation (emails between me and Rawdog) to several individuals, giving them instructions to come forward and allege murder if I was ever found dead. By doing that, I assured that murdering me would only expose this group, as opposed to helping them cover things up. I believe this same "friend" who had participated in this "conspiracy to commit murder" in exchange for discounted drugs and sexual favors probably realized that, were I killed, his good deal would end, so he wanted me kept alive so he could continue to "help" these criminals "manipulate" me and "manage" the problem they had created.

I have to point out, while the theory was wrong, it fits the same facts which are completely consistent with the behavior of those wanting to blackmail the Catholic Church. For instance, people first going out of their way to feed me compromising information and evidence of criminal wrong doing, only to then engage in what looks like an attempt at a cover up, which is then botched and further efforts to "try" to cover things up have to be instituted, which are then botched again, and at some point one starts concluding this is a scam involving people deliberately wanting to fail to solve a problem so they can keep making more money being paid to "try to" cover things up. However, at the time, nothing anyone ever told me gave me even the slightest hint that the Catholic Church might be involved. But perhaps that might mean they were all working very hard to throw me off the scent? 

Here I write: 

While I have described this group as "the mafia," they are more accurately described as a group of particularly nasty and mean-spirited individuals who ...are involved in an embezzlement scheme wherein money owed to the mafia goes into their pockets, and thus it is not really the mafia that is targetting me but these individuals who are targetting me. IF the mafia got involved, that is only because these individuals came up with a cover story falsely covering up their original motive for starting trouble with me, and attempting to make it look like I was the troublemaker who began to "spontaneously investigate people's lives and try to go to the police about them" when, in fact, the truth is the exact opposite.

 

I was not trying to get into trouble with anyone, I was not trying to expose anyone. I merely switched gyms. I went back to working out at the Cambridge Boston Sports Club where I had a personal trainer named Danny. I wanted to do some more personal training sessions with him. In my absence (I stopped working out there in Fall 2008), they had hired a gay man named Eddie as a Personal Trainer. He is, apparently, also a stripper at this mafia-connected bar named Ramrod/Machine, and he also works for the mafia as a prostitute. ...In any case, I later found out he is embroiled in a blackmail scheme where prostitutes are first manipulated into depriving the mafia of it's rightful "take" for about a year, and then are blackmailed into paying the money they owe to the mafia to private hands.

I suppose I should qualify this statement by explaining that this is the conclusion that I and a mafia-connected individual from Provincetown named James arrived at, during a conversation we had about this whole issue. In other words, I am not baldly making speculative conclusions that are not supported by the facts. I am making a conclusion that is based on the information I have been exposed to. I am, as I said before, not "in the mafia," and I do not know all the "ins and outs" of the situation. As someone who is not "on the inside," I can only "connect the dots," and make conclusions based on the information I have been exposed to.  -- P. 2-3

 

In any case, I'll note this was written in December of 2009, a few months after I submitted the report to the Family Justice Center and was abruptly excommunicated from all organizations I was previously dealing with there. 

I'll just note one thing. This was a letter written to my landlord, which was in response to him and a neighbor on the first floor beginning to try to harass me and tell me I needed to move because I was an alleged "problem." Without denying there was a problem, I forwarded this email to him along with enough incriminating evidence which proved, instead, that I was a victim of a crime -- a crime horrible enough so they had every right to be alarmed about it so as to immediately go to the police with the information I provided them proving it. 

This included proof of computer hacking, where emails were written to me on manhunt which discussed the situation and where a lot of men were writing threatening and intimidating emails to me on manhunt which could be seen as efforts to browbeat me into going along with something that did look like an effort to set me up on drug charges. These emails then disappeared in a manner that they shouldn't have -- aka, emails at the time could not be deleted from a manhunt "sent mail" folder, yet they were. However, before they were, I had hit "print screen" and documented their existence, and I subsequently hit "print screen" and documented the emails' disappearance.

And I also told my landlord in writing that, regarding him and the neighbor on the first floor, they sure had every right to be concerned about criminal wrong doing going on in the neighborhood, that I was a victim of dangerous criminals, that I was unable to get the police to do anything about it, but if they are concerned, then THEY should take this information I have for them, and go to the police and/or the FBI themselves. 

And did they go to the police? Of course not. And the fact that they didn't do so and instead suddenl dropped the matter allows me to make some amount of negative inferences regarding their motives and/or involvement in the whole situation in the first place. As a landlord, he had to back down. Massachusetts Landlord Tenant law requires that a landlord do whatever it takes to mitigate a nuisance that occurs on his property, or he can be sued for breach of quiet enjoyment. He knew that any attempt to file an eviction case against me would result in me submitting all of this evidence ON THE RECORD to the court, and argue it was a nuisance he was obliged to take action about. This would result in me getting a chance to submit this information into a PUBLIC RECORD -- and this was information the Boston Police were absolutely adamant could not show up in any public records anywhere. Therefore, anyone following the lead of corrupt cops would know not to push the issue in court. And, sure enough, he dropped it.

Before I publish the full letter, I need to just edit it a bit. I do have the original email on my computer, but I prefer to publish a condensed version. 

 

OK below is a condensed version of the letter I wrote my landlord. 

 

I also included a bunch of documentation, some of which contained undeniable proof that SOMETHING bizarre was going on. I will leave it out for now as I should go through it and just include the most relevant examples. At the time I assumed there was some sort of coordination with an IT worker at manhunt. However, I now realize it is equally likely that a computer hacker from anywhere -- such as Microsoft -- could have pulled this off remotely. 

https://damian-schloming.squarespace.com/email-to-landlord-discussing-several-incidents-dec-2009/

Theory 3. 

Man I began talking from an AOL hook up site who claimed to be "rich and powerful," who asked me if I was a sugardaddy, and I said no, and who later internet stalked me while I was working at Berkshire Hathaway was really a closeted gay Italian Mafia boss with pretend wife, connected to same prostitution ring discussed above, and did all this crazy stuff, infiltrated my company somehow and sicced this prostitution ring on me, etc., because he had some crazy fixation on me and I had expressed insufficient interest. 

This third theory at least allowed me to tie together various incidents that had happened before with what started happening a year after I left Berkshire Hathaway, so that I could have a fairly coherent "explanation" to tell people that was at least credible enough so people couldn't say I was crazy, and also which fit with the vast majority of the evidence I had. There were a few anomolies, though, but it didn't matter so much to me that the theory was true as that I at least had a coherent "story" along with enough documentation so people couldn't deny SOMETHING was going on. And, of course, you know how it is. If you are coherent, and you have proof of something, the only thing that might make you wrong or inaccurate is police refusal to investigate the situation and tell you what is really going on. 

Theory 4.

The rich online stalker who I refer above wasn't really a "closeted gay mafia boss with pretend wife" but a member of the Catholic Church, and this was a scheme whereby Berkshire Hathaway or other Wall Street criminals could blackmail the Catholic Church. This info was fed to me by Lori Bruno, a psychic of Salem, but someone who subtly indicated she had a source of information that was other than her "psychic ability" and I visited her for a few times largely to try to figure out more about what was going on. She told me Pope Benedict's resignation and whatever was going on with me were connected. At the same time, I was being encouraged to practice the organ at Memorial Church at Harvard, and the minister, Jonathan Walton, actually said in a private meeting in the Pusey Room of Memorial Church that it was Harvard that had told Pope Benedict to time his resignation at that particular time. Harvard then hired someone to work there as Sexton who this other guy named Adam seemed to have known about in some way, and Jonathan Walton introduced that Sexton as someone who had previously been working "undercover" to investigate the abuse situation in the Catholic Church. 

Meanwhile, it is true, the timing of the $1.5 billion embezzled out of the Vatican Bank was in perfect coherence with when I was being victimized the worst.

At the same time, I received a bunch of suggestive information from many different people suggesting I was really descended from Royalty in some way -- Italian/Romanov perhaps? -- and that had something to do with it all. I should consider summarizing those statements at some point, I suppose.

Lori Bruno then eventually admitted on facebook to having been working with the Salem Police -- which is something I kind of knew all along must have been going on, that was why I kept dealing with her. Some of the things she told me were obviously manipulative. One big problem is, if you are trying to get information, trying to get to the bottom of things, you have to act gullible, in hopes of getting more information and figuring things out. But acting gullible in such circumstances is not compatible with coming across as very competent, mentally. Here is where, you have to sometimes make a tradeoff. You really don't want to come across as "crazy" or "gullible" or capable of believing in any kind of conspiracy theory out there. But you do want to try to see if you can get a few nuggets of good information mixed in with the bad. I do know, at one point, Lori Bruno started telling me about how "they" control the weather, for instance, and how the whole world is really run by the Bilderberg Group. And "everyone is corrupt" and apparently I am the only non-corrupt person out there, all due to my isolated upbringing and home-schooling, no doubt, which prevented me from learning and understanding the ways of the world. 

Of course, I have been increasingly coming to suspect there is a legitimate investigation going on into this whole matter, which I may have been kept in the dark about for various purposes. And, given that I was brainwashed and manipulated, it's possible "more of the same" could be part of a legitimate investigation into the matter. For instance, they might have been trying to investigate how much I'd been intimidated into "agreeing" with everyone I spoke to. E.g., what I refer to as "obedience conditioning" I was subjected to. I notice how I was, at one time, "steered" towards anti-feminist Men's Rights Activism, even while feminist Naomi Wolf proved very receptive to me participating on her site. It is true, I "sort of" changed my political position depending on who my audience was. 

At the time, at Lori Bruno's prompting, for awhile I emphasized on the Men's Right's site that all of my problems were due to the Catholic Church, even while mentioning nothing about Harvard's role in the crime. And then, after not getting killed or threatened for doing so, I slowly started having the courage to talk about what happened at Harvard. A big problem was, so long as I was in fear of being accused of being crazy should I venture my own opinion, I feel much more secure quoting someone else's opinion or theory or "information" so as to avoid such negativity. 

Meanwhile, I believe it is true, in such investigations as would be going on around this, involved people do tend to communicate through all sorts of subtle hints and in round about ways, which could explain some of this erroneous sounding information. 

Example: "controlling the weather" or, as Lori Bruno said much more specifically "they have figured out a way to manipulate the weather into going hot and cold, all in order to avoid a world war" or something like that. She is not the only one who has made hints about "erratic weather," and the other contexts in which others have made hints allow me to conclude that it is probably a subtle reference to Harvard or corporate perpetrators leading the gay community into perpetrating a campaign of psychological torture and psychological warfare against me in the hook up scene, all so as to push me into a state of mind that is bad enough so they can cover it all up by saying I'm just "crazy." Or otherwise unstable or bad. Other references to same psychological torture include, at a gay Church service, a reference to people behaving like a flock of sheep. And, when I was growing up, my mother did educate me somewhat about psychological torture and ganglike behavior involving human beings behaving like a flock of sheep. 

I should just note, Massachusetts strengthened its witness intimidation law in 2006 in such a manner so as to make it easier to go after gangs. As a result of that, so much of this "psychological torture" behavior in the gay community is criminal, and the law is harsh and has teeth. I have since had hook ups with some of these gay men who I think could be said to have participated in psychological warfare against me. They had occupations of the type that would put them in easy position to be rewarded by corporate perpetrators for doing that to me. AND, they appear to have been at some point blackmailed and medically experimented on in criminal ways. And, I can't help but note how such a development would cause any attempted racketeering and fraud and modern day slavery case against certain corporate perpetrators to become much less ambiguous and much more easily "proven beyond a reasonable doubt" than before. 

Of course, I hesitate to make too many such leaps. But I am starting to wonder about that. A big problem is a barrage of brainwashing and people constantly accusing me of being a conspiracy theorist, leading me to possibly over-correct in the opposite direction.