When police won't investigate, you have to
Let me note: this is not the whole story. This is a work in progress. The whole story, however, is long and complicated enough so it's going to take quite some time to complete it. However, I'm willing to show people this website because, if you peruse all of the various materials, this is good enough for you to get a good idea of what sort of stuff was going on.
And, I'd recommend, before you read the following "summary" that you read my wordpress site:
http://dmschlom.wordpress.com/
And notice how the wordpress site leaves out quite a lot of interesting information that is included here. The reason I leave out such information in the previous site is, I am not one to simply make an assertion regarding something that happened without producing the documentary evidence to back it up. And, more complicated explanations require more complicated presentations of evidence -- which take quite some time to organize. Let alone the fact that it's painful to have to relive the past.
---------------------------------------------------------
Let me just spell out the same pattern that happened to me over and over and over again.
1. I am subjected to horrible psychological abuse/harassment/stalking at the hands of one or more gay men in Boston, usually with a heavy online component, and usually all of them from various gay hook up sites I am a member of.
The abuse usually involves several people, and is extremely clever and ingenious, like they are gifted at inflicting psychological and emotional harm, and reminds me of what is described on this website "how to be a girl bully."
http://www.violentacres.com/archives/89/how-to-be-a-girl-bully/
[Included later, a bit repetitive: Of particular interest should be what happened on gay . com in Boston. I started logging in there, around the time I was having terrible problems with Harvard and on the verge of dropping out. There were several Harvard connected individuals in that chatroom, with a lot of them in the IT industry, and the behavior of everyone there could not be described as anything other than manipulative.
One, in particular, befriended me so as to have an excuse to spread rumors that I was crazy, and eventually he launched what I can only describe as a virulent hate campaign against me, which all of the other joined in on, which was so virulent that I remember being the object of hate with the men in that chatroom basically talking about me from morning to night all day, always having nothing but hateful things to say about me and very openly explaining that, as regards my parents' attempts to have me declared permanently mentally incompetent (along with my brother), they are going to figure out some way to ensure that they personally intervene in such a legal process so as to ensure it happen. They also indicated quite openly that they were going to get the mafia involved in this. They also indicated some amount of insight into what would happen in the future, including hints that suggested they knew my twin brother would somehow be set up or entrapped in a situation where he would be accused of stalking Lauren Bush long before it actually happened, and then 'die in a hospital' as a result. After the hate campaign against me started, or became the most virulent, they even formed a group that met regularly, which was brought together pretty much solely because of me, where the only thing holding them together was essentially to bring me down. There were connections between some of them and some of the original perpetrators of certain kinds of harassment perpetrated against me while I was at Harvard. E.g., part of the same Harvard clique which has been responsible for arranging for me to be abused criminally for over 20 years.
A particularly important part of this was how, while I had tons of documentation showing that whatever was going on with my parents, my twin brother, and the mental health system was blatently fraudulent, these men would not be convinced. However, at the same time, I was successfully convincing one Malena Schneberger over the phone, an eccentric woman who works closely with corrupt politicians in Boston, but it was almost like she was helping to teach me how to articulate things in such a manner so as to sound convincing and persuasive, and I now realize in retrospect that she might have been manipulating me into communicating about the subject in ways that might have not sounded fully natural. She would selectively "play dumb" and selectively "realize and understand things" in a manner that I now realize was disingenuius and helped manipulate me into having low confidence with regard to my ability to ever pursuade people about complicated topics. In addition to that, the men in this gay dot com chatroom were ALSO manipulative in the sense that no amount of logical reasoning I personally used with them ever worked to sway them. But, once I figured out to copy and paste excerpts of some emails Malena sent me which indicated she agreed with me, everyone in the chatroom suddenly "saw the light" and very abruptly shut up about the whole matter, and even defensively got everyone to literally shun me and go from attacking me viciously every time I tried to make any point to literally all participating in a conspiracy to NOT RESPOND to anything I ever said EVER. This caused me to have very low confidence in my ability to pursuade others on my own, using logical reasoning and good arguments, and excessive confidence in my ability to pursuade others the moment I got someone else besides me to "back me up" no matter how lacking in credibility they really were. And all of this occurred at a very terrifying time in my life so as to have a very lasting impression, designed to distort my understanding of how to get along in the world and deal with issues that were to later come up. All of which I think shows a diabolically clever campaign by these gay men to manipulate me, with full and complete understanding of the crimes that were to take place in the future, and there is no way Harvard could not have been involved in this in a pre-meditated fashion. Sophisticated manipulation of a crime victim like this takes Harvard smarts to pull off. Meanwhile, as I type this, I also remember a meeting with some man I connected to somehow from the Office of Career Services at Harvard, who outright told me that corporations commit crimes and there is a huge amount of research into victim responses, and if they can control or manipulate victims into responding in predictable but abnormal ways to a crime, they can get away with it. He initially met me and told me all this under the pretext that he thought I had a future in corporations. Then, I do believe he may have emailed me or talked to me on the phone and explained I don't have such a future because I'm "too naive" or something along those lines. Perhaps a subtle hint there as to things he knew regarding Harvard's intentions towards me?]
2. At some point I go to other online sites besides gay dot com, and other gay men start befriending me online, and start telling me about criminal activities they "know" members of this group are involved with in an organized way, including rape, organized campaigns to involuntarily infect gay men with HIV, and pedophilia, including brutal rape of children. Same gay men will often tell me they have a contact with the police or some law enforcement apparatus, and they want to encourage me to inform the police.
3. The police stonewall me, or tell me they don't believe me, anything to encourage me to continue to document my conversations with gay men online, basically requiring me to investigate things on my own and build a case that proves it.
4. I sometimes also become a victim of a crime committed by either one of those who had already been involved in psychologically abusing me, or by someone who others later tell me is part of that same group. Or, indeed, a series of crimes is committed against me, all encouraging me to do as much as I can to feverishly document any and all criminal activity in hopes I can eventually submit something to the police or other parties and this will get them to take action to stop the abuse.
While I do this, I always seem to never have any shortage of gay men willing to work with me, collaborate with me, and help feed me information designed to lead to a specific theory or motive regarding how this is all part of some larger conspiracy or scheme. But, what would happen is, people dealing with me on the issue for awhile would either be proven wrong, discredited (along with whatever theory they had convinced me to believe in), they would either stop communicating with me, or I would stop communicating with them, and then afterwards I'd slowly develop a whole new group of contacts, who would essentially brainwash me into a completely different theory.
At this point, I have to question whether they might not have told me what they told me, only to then arrange for me to be criminally abused in some way so as to cause me to go to the police, they then deny having told me what they said, accuse me of lying, and even try to portray me as some kind of obsessed stalker making up stories. Indeed, this online stalker I'd dealt with for a long time while at Berkshire Hathaway even predicted to me, this young man working for Berkshire Hathaway who'd been coming onto me might accuse me of being "a sick man who makes up stories about people" -- all after I'd taken logs of him claiming to know this young man and simply forwarded them to HR asking what was going on. You can't be accused of making up stories when you merely are passing along information someone else told you in writing over the internet -- however, this man was the same man who had threatened to hire a hitman to kill me should logs of my online conversations with him ever potentially turn into a legal matter. So the threat was to destroy evidence regarding what he'd told me online and then accuse me of being "a sick man" who makes up being the victim of some kind of threat, totally out of thin air.
One quite interesting pattern was, every time anything criminal or otherwise disturbing happened to me, there was always some man there to lead me on and then play really nasty games of a nature that would tempt anyone to be vindictive, and then I'm told what happened to me involves organized criminal activity and/or that the man who had been really nasty to me was involved in that organized criminal activity too. The message was "we're telling you this, but if you go to the cops, they won't believe you because, once they know how nasty that guy was to you, they'll think you are just making it up to get revenge."
In some cases, I would have been led on in private in sneaky ways by men who could later claim they did no such thing. In other cases, it all took place on the internet and in writing, so it is a bit much to try to accuse me of making all THAT up. It is also true, though, that rapes that occurred always occurred in a context where it was almost like they were plotted out in advance, with some individual always combining the rape with a kind of emotional or psychological cruelty extreme enough so as to make it look like I might have falsely claimed rape just to try to get even. Though, of course, not true -- if you only knew of the huge amount of cruelty I'd suffered years of from the gay community, and not once falsely cried rape despite a lot of "emotional provocation" that would have caused me to have already done so years prior to when I did, if I was the type of person to lie about it in the first place. Indeed, for years I'd tell a lot of the cruel gays that I know something criminal is going on, I don't know what it is, but I will save my conversations with them and when I figure it out, I will report them as possibly involved. Well, I did eventually, but only after I figured out what it might have been. No effort to fabricate anything in the moment involving rape.
Now one reason why I was extremely vulnerable to this was the phenonemon of several gay men feeding me consistent misinformation that "agreed" with one another, who appeared not to know each other. Except, later on, it turned out that they did. And they may well have all denied it and accused me of making it up. And, if so, nobody told me, instead other people merely manipulated me further and intentionally confused me further. One policewoman from the Family Justice Center DID tell me that, if it were true that many gay men were engaging in a kind of coordinated behavior with regard to me like that, law enforcement could easily research it by looking up their phone records, and completely smoke them out. However, they refused to do that. And, on my own, I couldn't.
MORE ON EVOLVING THEORIES EXPLAINING ABUSE AND INACTION BY POLICE WHICH I ARRIVED AT DUE TO ERRONEOUS INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO ME AS WELL AS MANIPULATION/BRAINWASHING.
http://damian-schloming.squarespace.com/evolving-theories-as-to-what-was-behind-the-abuse/
When did this start? I'd say the psychological abuse from gay men started in 2003 -- and this was really severe abuse at that, almost like a bunch of gay men really wanted me to hate the gay community and they went really far out of their way to gang up on me and bully me in horrible ways for years so as to leave me very resentful and more easily manipulated into wanting to bring gay perpetrators to justice, the moment I was exposed to such information.
[Editted to include more information I previously left out: By 2003, I had already suffered from years of abuse and harassment from students and administrators at Harvard while I was a student at Harvard, some of it instigated by students who became employees of Microsoft. or by other students who knew them. I had particularly terrible problems at Harvard while Bill Gates friend, Harry Lewis, was dean, and when I was ganged up on by gay men in this chatroom, a large contingent of the gay men in this chatroom were associated with Harvard and also worked in IT.
One gay man was a secretary for Dean Harry Lewis. Another gay man was a student who was close to Harry Lewis, a friend of Jordan Tigani who was the first student at Harvard who assaulted and sexually harassed me in my Freshman year (leading to an Ad Board case) who became employed with Microsoft, as did Jordan Tigani. Another gay man was the editor who wrote or editted the "handbook for students" and maybe the course catalogue for Harvard. And most of this hate spewed against me was done under the pretense that they were treating me this way because I was crazy.
And I ought to note, after I complained about harassment and wrong-doing by Murray Somerville, Memorial Church organist, and a couple of students, Harvard abruptly started insisting I was crazy, and refused to investigate the matter under the pretense that they didn't believe me because I was crazy. Yet, prior to that, Harvard insisted I was normal and didn't have bipolar disorder or anything like that. So for a contingent of the gay community with lots of ties to Harvard to go on a hate campaign attempting to incite violence against me under the heading that they are doing this to me because I am "crazy" already sounds pretty suspicious.
Meanwhile, it also sounds to me like Murray Somerville and company may have deliberately engaged in wrong-doing, certain Administrators may have deliberately handled it corruptly, and these gay members of the IT profession with ties to Harvard may have deliberately first encouraged me to talk about my problems with Harvard and then gone on a campaign to try to "spread the word" that I was "crazy" solely as a way to help Bill Gates and Warren Buffett blackmail Harvard, so they could carry out the crimes they later carried out against me, with further help from gay criminals, and Harvard would pull strings to ensure impunity. I don't know what issues revolving around closeted homosexuality or even worse (pedophilia maybe?) and various perks, sexual favors, as well as, for students, promises of enhanced career trajectories may have contributed to various individuals participating in behavior that would certainly seem risky for Harvard's reputation. But I've heard a lot of such speculation from a lot of people for a very long time.
Meanwhile, I ought to note if I look up previous weblogs from that gay chatroom, some of the speculation these gay men engaged in regarding my future was quite interesting. It looks like they may have known in advance that my twin brother would somehow be manipulated into putting himself in a position to be accused of being stalked by Lauren Bush, and end up hospitalized under corrupt circumstances where lack of trial can mean all sorts of things could be covered up. They sure did tell me over and over again they were going to ensure that both my twin brother and me end up in a psych ward, and that they -- these members of the gay community -- are going to go out of their way to figure out how to ensure that both of us are declared to be insane so as to discredit us. But, I want to note, they did say they would only do that AFTER grandma and grandpa died, when my parents would be trying to feverishly declare us insane so as to get at the inheritance. But here, in a way they were baldly declaring their intentions to be involved in something corrupt. If you have a mental health issue that requires incarceration in an institution, you need to be incarcerated NOW, and not six years from now only after grandma and grandpa die and parents want you incarcerated solely due to the money. But, no, these gays didn't want to involve themselves in that now. I might be insane and in need of such incarceration. Now wasn't a good time for that. Six years later, after they die, is better. No one has the "insight" to be able to intuit that you are insane and need to be institutionalized, but not right away, only six years down the road. However, the fact that grandma and grandpa both died unnatural deaths, immediately after I started being date rape drugged over and over again, suggests these gays possessed some kind of criminal knowledge regarding crimes that were planned to take place several years into the future.
I ought to note: why would they take such an interest in my personal life and develop such an obsession with me, so much so that they ended up engaging in regular meetings where I was a topic of conversation that came up very often? Meanwhile I should note plenty of them sure suffered from mental health problems and neuroses of their own. That did not make any of them crazy, for some reason. And, again, if I was "crazy," it was all because of my problems with Harvard.
Why bother to go to all this trouble discrediting someone for nothing? I should also note, when Lucas somehow got accused of stalking Lauren Bush, they were all like "I told you so" in the chatroom. All in all, I have to say all this was pretty indiscreet. At the same time, later events made it become all too obvious that they figured none of these fairly incriminating remarks would ever see the light of day. Because they were all too aware of the power of the criminal justice system and mental health system to engage in cover ups.
I ought to note, the hate and abuse was especially sadistic, it went on for years and was witnessed by hundreds of gay men, all so pretty much the whole gay community knew about it, and it was very similar in tone to the harassment you can read here:
http://www.pbase.com/damian1974/jpboy_about_justin_who_was_then_age_23_but
I should note, when I first wrote up this site, I left all this information out because I was still "covering up" what happened to me at Harvard and covering up the Harvard connection out of fear.
(Added November 4, 2015) A further twist I neglected to mention was, the same gay men who began this hate campaign against me, alleging their motives for all this hate were that they thought I was "crazy" were the same individuals who, privately, met with me and began convincing me I wasn't bipolar, nothing was wrong with me, I had only been brainwashed into thinking I was bipolar and fraudulently diagnosed by my parents who were out for my inheritance money. I did not do weblogs then, so I have no proof of that. Meanwhile, in addition to the other Harvard characters in the chatroom, there was also someone who worked at the Harvard IT department and someone else who laid out the course catalogue when it was done on paper. The guy who laid out the course catalogue was the same guy who advised me to start doing weblogs of what was going on in the chatroom, and elsewhere, but only after these gay men had done an about face and, suddenly, inexplicably, and to my shock, started saying publicly that I was crazy, and that's what they had thought about me all along. This suggests secretive Harvard involvement in wanting my bipolar diagnosis reversed, so they could take advantage of me in various ways, but then it would be possible to compare my brain to that of my twin brother, to verify whether the neureleptics he was on caused brain shrinkage, e.g., the criminal scheme with Berkshire Hathaway probably also was being piggy backed upon an underground Mengele style "twin" study they wanted to do on anti-psychotic brain shrinkage effects. Notice how I previously left this out. This is because, even though it's true, I have a habit of not even TRYING to allege anything that I don't have backup evidence for that is independent of my eye witness testimony.]
However, it was not until right around the time I started working for Berkshire Hathaway -- or, more accurately, the company Berkshire Hathaway bought, and using my gmail account often on Microsoft computers there where apparently various computer monitoring went on that may have ensured the federal government had access to any emails I opened up from my private gmail account there, that people started coming to me with specific tails of criminal activities in the gay community, and encouraging me to go to the police about them. I ought to note, I started out as a temp, and my job became permanent almost exactly around the time Warren Buffet suddenly decided he didn't want to leave his money to his own charity but preferred, instead, to leave it all to the Gates Foundation.
I need to also note, some of the online stalking I was subjected to included one man who would get angry or cross with me at times and then later tell me he hadn't really said anything like that, that a computer hacker had come in and hacked his computer and manipulated things so as to make it look like that. He also told me if I ever make too big of a fuss over my conversations with him (he was telling me he was rich and powerful and capable of destroying people who got in his way, and in particular he was concerned that the weblogs of my conversations with him never become public or used in any court procueeding) then he'd hire a hit man to kill me. But, he also told me I had to delete the weblogs of my conversations with him. I told him I had, but I refused to. And then I later discover them to have been somehow deleted via computer hacking. This is important because it is relevant to why I would have been hesitant to go to the police after certain criminal activity had taken place where the perpetrators kept telling me if I went to the police, they'll just say I'm crazy, and nobody will believe me. At issue was whether all evidence on my computer could be destroyed via computer hacker, and then I really WOULD look crazy. And, it would have been very easy for the perpetrators to get away with this as my parents had a habit of systematically helping any and all of these criminals suppress evidence and my parents also helped them intimidate me by destroying evidence themselves, including throwing out one of my computers. It is crucially important, from the point of understanding how the crime happened, to understand that my parents had made it very clear to me over the course of a number of years that they could be counted on to obstruct justice on behalf of the perpetrators.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DfVTATXTucaGd3dXVkSkhQWGM/edit?usp=sharing
The file name I saved it under long ago was: "emails following up with him after I went to the Boston Police SUDDEN STONEWALL."
This is someone who claimed to have a friend in law enforcement, and I was hoping he could call up his friend and maybe his friend could pressure the Boston Police to take it more seriously. As I write September 18, 2006:
I'm getting a bit annoyed with the Boston police. They won't do
anything about the poz group, and haven't returned my phone calls.
However, I've been talking with this other person who is willing to
wear a wire. He is probably poz himself and is willing to get pozzed,
and I thought maybe he could do that and wear a wire but it would be
hard since he knows they are poz so what's the crime in that? Well,
they are very interested in him being a part of the group, but the
latest development I heard was that they wanted him to be one of the
pozzers. I.e., they wanted to initiate him into the group. Where he'd
go and and participate in pozzing an unsuspecting hiv neg guy who
didn't know they were positive. Once you have become "initiated" in
that manner, then you've been compromised in the sense that you have
done something wrong/criminal and then they feel more comfortable with
you because you can't get them into trouble without getting into
trouble yourself.
It would be perfect for this guy to wear a wire and agree to be
"initiated" - only before any pozzing of the unsuspecting hiv neg guy
takes place, the police come in and arrest them all. And, it would be
caught on tape and easily prosecutable. However, could I get the
Boston police to agree to this? They refuse to return phone calls.
Here is an opportunity to get this group and put them out of business
and they are stonewalling. If someone took the matter into their own
hands, would they take action? Because if the police have an
opportunity to stop a horrible crime and refuse to do nothing, aren't
private parties obligated to do what they can to stop wrong from being
done?
Can you talk to your friend and tell him that there is someone willing
to participate in a sting which would be very well designed and very
likely to prove everything. In addition to which there are drugs too
so they'd definitely be able to file charges for SOMETHING. Please do
it fast as we need to act fast on this. If the guy I know keeps on
stalling - he doesn't want to poz anyone who doesn't want it - they'll
eventually lose interest in him and the opportunity will be lost.
Now I ought to note. Those who told me about this criminal group of men who deliberately tried to infect HIV negative men ALSO told me that their leader was a particular man who had played a pretty nasty game on me online that would be seemingly deliberately designed to make me hate him. But, the way it goes, one does not want to appear to be going to the police about a man like this solely for revenge.
However, the moment you learn he is involving with pimping out the children of drug addicts:
See below:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DfVTATXTucd1NxZVpOSzNmLVk/edit?usp=sharing
And you are also talking to another man who claims he is being sadistically raped, tortured, and prostituted out by same obnoxious man who, by the way, continues a pattern of occasional stalking of me online...
See below:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DfVTATXTucRjZNMXdQQ2RibjQ/edit?usp=sharing
...
one starts thinking to hell with avoiding appearing vengeful. Going to the police is the right thing to do. And all those gay men certainly were urging me to. They just wanted me to go to the police so bad. Except, every single one of them suddenly becomes unavailable to talk to me the moment I do so. Meanwhile, police possibly agreed to file a police report, but otherwise did nothing.
[Added October 2016: Critically important is to understand, police refused to call such individuals up or try to contact them, to ask them to repeat to them what they told me, and if they were going to deny it, why did they tell me this in the first place and encourage me to go to the police about it in the first place.
This occurred in a context where I had documentary evidence showing these men had told me all this online. However, in light of the ability of criminal computer hackers to destroy this evidence via computer hacking, the refusal of police to investigate or take anything seriously could have allowed for these men later to retract what they said, and make me look like I'm crazy and concocting hoaxes, something my parents would have colluded with them on.
I note, it is one thing if I'm merely reporting hearsay regarding criminal behavior. Quite another matter if I'm the victim of a crime and police won't even touch it -- the perpetrators have to come forward and turn themselves in and confess.
The strategy here was to make me get used to the circumstance of police simply not responding to anything I ever reported to them. In addition to which, police could also have helped perpetrate the crime by telling me they don't believe me, are too busy, and don't want to be bothered, only to then proceed to secretly talking to such individuals who fed me all this erroneous information, who go tell me it's false and I just concocted a fake story to get revenge for a number of reasons - see past history of horrible treatment by the gay community - and police can then call up my parents and get my parents to quietly discredit me, and then proceed not to tell me, and not to give me a chance to rebut such a strategy or even know about it. Meanwhile, I need to note that, while working for Berkshire Hathaway, this online stalker connected to the company threatened just that in another context, or threatened me that Berkshire Hathaway would employ exactly that sort of strategy against me, selectively withholding information and putting erroneous information together designed to discredit me AND he also helped educate me about the issue whereby even if I had documentary evidence proving I wasn't lying, it could all be destroyed via computer hacker. Meanwhile, this Malena Schneberger person even told me I should definitely not take my computer to the police, because "they are criminals too" and will figure out some way to either lose it or otherwise destroy such evidence themselves, once it is in their possession. Simultaneously, my parents communicated to me via their actions a predilection to destroy any evidence I had of criminal wrong doing as well, even going so far as to throw out a computer I had that had evidence on it, and throw out urine and blood samples I had taken after having been involuntarily drugged by an unknown substance. So I couldn't go to the police with my computer -- and give my parents a backup disk to hold to guard against any corruption. Should such a corrupt cover up ensue, I knew my parents would participate in it. ]
In any case, the above email showing how I'm encouraged to go to the police only to have them stonewall me is one example of something that happened to me over and over again. And I have countless others. And this one is a fairly innocuous example. However, as time went on, the criminality of the situation increased, and the abuse started including more and more stuff that was both very scandalous and extreme -- something I feel would make sense under the assumption that police and criminal gays were abusing me with the understanding that such abuse could potentially be corruptly pinned on the Catholic Church by the Federal Government, and the value of the money to be extorted from the Vatican would go up in proportion to the increasingly horrifying nature of the crimes committed against me--someone who possessed evidence of wrong-doing which PROBABLY COULD have been traced back to Catholic Priests and even Pedophile Priests by the criminal justice system....but ONLY IF THEY WANTED TO. If they didn't want to, I could do nothing but put up with what they kept doing to me.
[Added October 2016: I should note, while it is possible the Vatican might have been involved, and that the man stalking me online at Berkshire Hathaway was maybe a Catholic priest, I'd say it was Harvard that was most likely the institution being blackmailed the most. You only need to know about my past history at Harvard, and the things they had done, to understand.]
I say probably, because only the Federal Government and the NSA really knows for sure. But it makes perfect sense to me that they would have plenty of incriminating information, and are just sitting on it all so as to be able to continue to milk it for all its worth on behalf of super rich campaign contributors.
In any case, notice how the above set of incidents is in 2006 and 2007. Just look at the following incident I report upon in my wordpress account, involving me being date rape drugged at ramrod in Boston.
http://dmschlom.wordpress.com/2014/08/04/80/
It occurred January 2009.
Then note, I am still being subjected to more abuse and games in June of 2010:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DfVTATXTucYU5KcTBRYXNtTHc/edit?usp=sharing
In other words, what I am describing is years of abuse. Much of it extremely sociopathic.
Furthermore, it was organized and systematic in a manner described perfectly by none other than Catharine MacKinnon in the following video.
http://www.makers.com/moments/turning-point
"I went to New Haven in 1969-1970, and that’s when everything happened. When I and the women’s movement, at least as I knew it, began. And there was a CR group,a consciousness raising group put together at the policital science department which included the secretaries and wives of the graduate students.
What I learned from them was basically that no one really knew what was going on with women. Nobody knows how much sexual abuse there is. You know, what I specifically remember was finding out about it from all these women, I mean, them having been sexually abused as children, them having been raped before, and [pause] rather recently, what was going on in their sexual relationships, either with men they were close with, or [pause] friends or men that they knew.
What hit me was the systematicity of it, the interlinked inter-connectedness, of all these things that had been regarded as separate and discreet criminal acts against individuals, but what I understood at that moment was that what it really is to be a second class citizen as a woman is to be in a position so as to be systematically sexually violated, that was really crucial, it was just a fracturing open of reality. And I’ve never forgotten it. I mean it just changed me. You know that’s the work I’ve done ever since.”
The only changes you need to make to render her scenario more accurate is to stop believing it is a gender issue, something that men do to women, and understand that one can only be systematically sexually violated so long as the criminal justice system itself is systematically participating in such sexual violation. And then you instantly know, what with the criminal justice system capable of threatening men and women equally well, and what with it being an institution that relies on evidence given (or covered up) by both men and women, one cannot be systematically abused in such a way without being essentially ganged up on by people of both genders.
Furthermore, one might be skeptical of her claims that she found out all about this ONLY secondhand from secretaries, as opposed to having learnt about it from going through it herself. Here she describes how rape is being recognized as part of the process whereby Genocide occurs:
http://www.makers.com/moments/women-law
And, indeed, she is right. Rape and the manipulation of rape law so as to "weaponize" rape and use it as a tool to blackmail guilty parties and control them, e.g., force them to do things they don't want to do, certain should be seen as a tool used by totalitarian regimes to systematically exert control over key players in a totalitarian regime. At this point, the requirement to commit rape and other atrocities will be seen as a necessary qualification for advancement up the ranks. However, she leaves out how sodomy laws and associated blackmail of men are equally important tools.
One only needs to suppose that maybe she might have been systematically abused in some way herself, perhaps for a long time, and also note that such systematic abuse cannot be done without involvement of the criminal justice system and various affiliated organs of government and private business. And then note how the same criminal justice system would have ample motive to use such abuse of victims -- and agreements to cease the abuse for a price -- as a way to force someone to promulgate a theory that suits their purposes. And at this point I have to note Catharine MacKinnon's feminism appears to be a subtle distortion of reality which helps to enable Mass Incarceration, and it is no accident her father sat on the Federal Sentencing Commission crafting the Mandatory Minimums without which our prison population would still be a tenth of what it is today. And people connected to it that much poorer.
And, indeed, everything she says in the following video would appear to imply the same, wherein she refers to law school in odd terms as "that system" which you "go through":
http://www.makers.com/moments/pressure-succeed
“The thing that happens to women who go to law school and they have a vision of .. and men too … of wanting to do something for people for real, and every year they go through that system they get made smaller and smaller and learn, they unlearn everything they ever cared about and disidentify with their communities, because they want to be a “success.” And you know the question is not whether you can succeed but it’s what you are going to succeed as. Do not cave in. Do not listen to people who tell you you can’t do it. Do not let them make you small. As if the whole world isn’t your place.”
Furthermore, according to Janet Halley of the following article on the weaponization of rape, it would appear that the manner in which the criminal justice system somehow incorporated some of Catharine MacKinnon's work is either not really consistent with her true beliefs, or else she has taken inconsistent positions at different times.
http://misr.mak.ac.ug/old.site/uploads/Halley%20Presentation.pdf
"First, well within feminism, surely there is room to wonder whether the intensification of international humanitarian and criminal condemnation of rape in wartime will always be good for women. Such intensification can make the prohibited conduct more useful as a weapon of war. If you want to start a war or energize people on your side to fight one, you can charge men the other side with raping women on your side; or you can rape the women over there. This is the well-known phenomenon of weaponization. ... Well organized armed forces may well rape less often because the ICC has these new rules; but ill-organized ones may be unaffected entirely or may even identify rape as newly weaponized and do it more often..... This is not an effect peculiar to prohibitions on sexual violence in armed conflict: the whole international humanitarian law facilitates this sorting of legitimate from illegitimate uses of force.
...Feminist universalist law reform at the Rome Conference was entirely complicit with this dimension of the invention of the ICC. It’s an effect of the carceral turn in feminism. The MacKinnon of the Signs articles would not have gone there: she understood this critique – we lawyers call it the legitimation critique – and argued against making it a feminist project to criminalize rape. When she abandoned this critique, and embraced criminal law, she was part of a large forgetting. It’s time to remember!"
In other words, the most influential feminist in the world has changed her story a few times, eventually altering her feminist theory in such a manner as to do what such scholars as Janet Halley argue weaponizes rape in a manner that makes it useful for third parties to use it for ulterior purposes other than protection of victims, and to quite obviously benefit or profit from it in a manner that gives them a motive to direct or encourage the systematic sexual (and non-sexual) violation of people en masse.
In any case, I reiterate, if things were so bad in New Haven with regard to systematic sexual abuse of women, how do we know Catharine MacKinnon herself was the only one who escaped it? And how do we not know distortions of her theory might not have been in response to a desire not to be abused again? If I were her, I'd never want to say that law school is "a system" that you "go through" which makes you smaller and forces you to forget everything you believed in and takes you further from your own people, without defensively proceeding to explain why that didn't happen to me too. And why I am a free agent who has not been coerced into towing an establishment line that isn't what I truly believe in.
It would be paradoxical for Catharine MacKinnon to argue that this is what Law School does to its students, and to simultaneously argue it did not happen to her -- the most influential feminist in the world -- and she is somehow unique and her feminist positions (or the way they were systematically distorted, by her, or by others with her tacit acceptance) were not somehow a product of this process. The adoption of her structural feminist jurisprudence theory, I note, coincided with a massively increasing inequality of wealth and enormous redistribution of wealth to the very top, in which case we cannot say that her jurisprudence , as adopted, represented something "outside" the system, or a challenge to the establishment.
That is the underlying problem with her feminist position. If women are so systematically subordinated so badly and so thoroughly by "the patriarchy," then we need to not take them too seriously. After all, why would "the patriarchy" seek to systematically subordinate women -- and not then proceed to take full advantage of such subordination to use them as puppets, all in order to use them to promulgate various ideologies that enhance "the patriarchy's" profits? In which case, perhaps it's wrong to say we should "not take them too seriously." SOME of what they say should be taken WAY MORE seriously -- particularly about the systematicity of being sexually violated -- but then this would require we take certain other things that they say with a hefty grain of salt. People so subordinated won't be in a position to TELL the whole story. They wouldn't dare.
Furthermore, why should the system subordinate only women, and not insist on doing the same to men? If men weren't subordinated too, why couldn't women seek help from men and get it? The answer is: women cannot be systematically subordinated in the way MacKinnon describes, and which my personal experiences attest to, without men being similarly subordinated either just as much or even more.
Or, at least, maybe what goes on is a complicated situation of reward plus subordination/intimidation, for both sexes. I just want to note, however, that the “system” I was put through by Harvard and crooked cops and the mafia appears to be a system that looks a hell of a lot like what MacKinnon talks about when she refers to women being “systematically subordinated.” Clever and sneaky criminal racketeering involved covered up crimes and intimidation, with me having to live in fear of several different alternative “potential cover ups” all at once. Which would have been perpetrated by a system capable of switching back and forth effortlessly between trying to cover it up by murdering me versus merely trying to cover it up by saying I was crazy (and destroying all evidence showing I wasn’t) or trying to cover it up by framing me for a crime I didn’t commit (and then arranging for me to be tortured and killed in prison).
However, one unique thing about me was that, because I was a man, I was able to put myself in certain situations too dangerous for a woman ever to contemplate, all in an effort to “gather evidence” that sought to prove REGARDLESS of potential contemplated cover ups by the perpetrators (many in the corrupt police forces) that I was, still, a victim of the mafia. I think that is interesting, though, that only I could ever prove what goes on, because I have muscles, and also the daring.
And, I mean, if a certain system of systemic abuse and corruption is one which women cannot expose and more easily succumb to, but men do have the power - potentially - to expose it and bring it to its knees, doesn’t it make sense that same system would find men to be the more “threatening” sex? And thus work harder to control men and keep them in line than it works to control women?
It is because I still have this evidence that I can take the things Catharine MacKinnon says, and expand on them far more explicitly regarding “what really happens” which she only hints vaguely about. However, based on what she says in hints, it still does sound to me like she was put through the same system, a similar series of traumatizing and intimidating incidences, and emerged from them unable to prove enough so as to be able to fully and completely elaborate on the whole truth, as opposed to a piece of it.
Aside from that argument, if the systematic abuse of one person can get the Powers That Be a certain amount of money, why limit the abuse to one person and not two? In addition, why even limit the abuse to one gender, one race, one sexual orientation, or one class, when you can make more money by being "inclusive" with regard to whom you choose to abuse? Who out there wants to make less money when they can make more?
In which case, it's not about men subordinating women. It's about the system subordinating everybody.
Furthermore, I note, MacKinnonite feminism sprang forth in the Reaganite 80's, her father was a Republican Senator at the time, and is a deep part of the neoliberal order that emerged from that time. It is described by some as fascist or totalitarian -- and it is no accident that all fascist or totalitarian regimes are characterized by horrific private scandalous abuse that gets covered up and used to blackmail and control various elites and use them as puppets. Hannah Ahrendt described camps where Nazi insiders would commit horrible atrocities and abuse against victims -- with special care to point out that such abuse was a "very important part of the totalitarian regime." (Not necessarily an exact quote -- I'm quoting from memory.)
More on this topic can be seen in what I wrote here (as dmschlom) on A Voice For Men:
Much more articulately expressed as I was calmer, having avoided thinking about all of the abuse for awhile.
However, I also want to further note the Reagan Era Connection by noting how you will see, in this site, many references I make to people -- including police officers -- from the Family Justice Center. What is the Family Justice Center, pray tell?
It is a product of the Reagan era focus on "privatization" and thus most accurately described as a hybrid between the police force and the private business world. Now, during most of the history of the USA, we relied on policemen funded by taxpayer dollars, and the notion of policemen supplementing their salaries with donations from private business interests was always viewed as bribery and unethical. Well, as far as I know, the Family Justice Center consists of organizations that may get public funds but which also subsists on private funds from business as well. In other words, it appears to be legalized institutionalized bribery. The erroneous unspoken assumption being, I suppose, that when it comes to "women's issues," there can be considered to be no such thing as corruption or conflicts of interest.
Rape is such an immensely important issue -- indeed, it is sacred!! -- that, above all, those officials who specialize in the handling of rape must, in comparison to all other law enforcement officials, be assumed to be pure and certainly never should ever have to suffer such indignities as corruption probes or insinuations that, like all other crooked cops, they sometimes take bribes from career criminals and drug dealers, some of whom might be serial rapists. Just like how a priest, as long as he is pious enough in public, could never possibly be a pedophile.
In any case, if you look at the wordpress account...
http://dmschlom.wordpress.com/
...showing the sudden intensification of abuse in January of 2009, you should know it was after I had a good amount of incriminating information from before, which I had given up on going to the police about. Certainly an intensification of abuse would goad me into trying to report stuff to the police again. And I think it is interesting that several people, including friends of Eddie -- the stripper/personal trainer who had gotten a job at my gym -- were fairly eager to talk to me about the issue for a very long time on the FBI (and probably NSA monitored) manhunt in writing, and VERY indiscreet with regard to making all sorts of incriminating admissions about Eddie's involvement with "unsavory characters" which would seem to me to be perfectly calculated to allow me to prepare a report which, if taken to the police, would give them ample excuse to launch an investigation.
And give the police -- and undoubtedly many others -- ample amounts of money in return for agreeing to cover things up and make it "all go away."
Here is a copy of the folder showing all of the emails that went back and forth between me and Eddie's roommate over a short period of time. Let me ask, why would this man spend so much time trying to talk to me for so long on manhunt about the issue? Instead of saying "I don't want to be involved?"
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DfVTATXTuceGpZMXVoa3BhR1k/edit?usp=sharing
Furthermore, if you read the emails, they are anything but non-incriminating. And I could do a longer analysis and perhaps will on another page. But right now I will just copy and paste the two links to both of them. (Feb 2009).
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DfVTATXTucNUdpQThXdDFBRGs/edit?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DfVTATXTucOG1TWW9NYk5XWGc/edit?usp=sharing
[added 3/4/2017 -- I should note, the things "Rawdog" told me had immense significance, inasmuch as the corruption he spoke of revolving around police really all came true. My flash drive was, at one time, stolen -- by a man who visited me claiming to be close to the Fenway Community Health Center and telling me he wanted to talk to me about the situation and was hoping to "help" me go to the police about it. Following that visit, Fenway Community Health Center abruptly canceled my meeting with their Violence Recovery Program, and told me I was banned from working with them. That conversation with Rawdog was preceded by a "prediction" from a crystal meth user that I was going to soon piss off someone and get hurt somehow. Following that conversation, Rob Bocash, who had been regularly communicating with me, somewhat nastily told me online something about how I had provoked them by digging in too deep and "sooner or later they are going to get you," and I was shortly afterwards framed on false charges by crooked cops who, when I start telling them this was done in retaliation for my having threatened to get certain criminal types prosecuted, including possible pedophiles, they basically threatened to plant child porn on my computer or otherwise figure out a way to frame me.
Note how Rawdog threatens me that crooked cops will come to get my hard drive -- and know to take the flash drive too. E.g., he was threatening some kind of cover up involving destruction of all evidence of computer threats. Same crooked cops who framed me went one further, and threatened to go further and not only destroy evidence but plant fake incriminating evidence.
Malena Schneberger then informs me about how it's a bad idea to go to the police and let them get their hands on my computer, because "they are criminals too, only they do it better" and that I do not want my very attempts to report to the police result in the destruction of all my evidence.
I hire an attorney after having been framed, he initially says I should try to gather together any and all evidence on the "prostitution ring" Eddie is involved in to try to see if that would help with the charges, but he also says if I am going to dare to allege police misconduct, I'd better have a very airtight case, because of how badly prosecutors will punish me for making the police look bad. Meanwhile, he did not initial file discovery, and get the kind of evidence that would show very suspicious activity with the police. Indeed, I did not know at first how suspicious Mansfield police looked at the time because my parents did not tell me the full story of how they had called them and what they were told. It was enough obvious that I had been framed so that my attorney should have filed discovery and then demanded an investigation into the matter. He, instead, didn't do it, and then started coordinating with various other gay criminals who had been threatening me so as to start threatening me in the same manner, bellowing at me at times. Meanwhile, he threatened me that, should I not lay low, police might frame me again, and if they do so, I knew he'd refuse to cooperate with my getting the evidence that it was a frame up in the record, and instead basically participate in both a cover up and a frame up on false charges. Again, a full confirmation of the threat Rawdog made regarding how "when they come to get your hard drive, they'll know to take your flash drive too." E.g., the promise was to frame me on potentially blatently false charges, all the while rigging things so my own attorney cooperates with the suppression of exculpatory evidence on my behalf, and also cooperating with the destruction of any evidence suggesting that, even if an attempted frame up LOOKS airtight, maybe various mob types had a motive to conduct it anyway and it should be investigated more closely. Then, on top of it, there was the threat to rule any allegations on my part that I'm the victim of these blatent criminal threats and harassment to be the figment of my imagination and the product of my being "crazy." E.g., I get ruled incompetent to assist in my own defense, all as part of a tactic designed to help a corrupt defense lawyer participate in the cover up of crimes perpetrated against me by others which they were so bold as to announce the crimes IN WRITING IN ADVANCE in manners I was able to document and record on my computer.
I note, I later take all this to some police women, who then proceed to basically concur with exactly what Rawdog had already promised. E.g., "you're just crazy, nobody is doing anything to you, you're just crazy." And then they refused to do a police report and they -- and other police -- became very fussy and insistent about how all such evidence I had NOT be entered into the record, and insistent that there exist no evidence I had even told them about any of it. ]
And, actually, below is some writing I was working on before, which helps explain a few things:
-------
The reason I was talking to Rawdog in the first place, as opposed to going directly to Eddie, was that when people connected with Ramrod (where Eddie also worked) had initially drugged me and threatened me, I tried to talk to Eddie about it and he played dumb and seemed reluctant to discuss it with me, other than to tell me to “be careful” because there were “a lot of very bad people at Ramrod/Machine.” Furthermore, I was also talking to Rawdog due to “advice” (or maybe was it manipulation?) from a female police officer from the family justice center whom I had consulted after the date rape drugging incident. She was from a part of the police that deals with sex trafficking, and the only reason why I went to that office was because of one character, intimately connected to Ramrod, who had done a pretty good job of assuring me that Eddie and Mark were drug dealers, and Eddie was a prostitute as well, but they were only pretend boyfriends and this was all a cover for some bizarre criminal enterprise involving Mark as a pimp and Eddie as Pimpee.
I find it interesting how this story, told by several criminal types connected to Ramrod, would have played into the hands of those who might have later advised me steered me towards consulting with policemen from the family justice center in the first place. Were they goading me into working with them?
The odd thing was, the female police officer was unwilling to consider me as a victim, despite the fact that I was complaining about being date rape drugged, and, indeed, there was already another open rape case from a few months earlier in which I was the victim. She told me I needed to convince Eddie – an employee of the bar that date rape drugged me – to testify against them first before she or the police would do anything. The idea was, at the time, no matter how badly people connected with Ramrod may have harassed me, the police had nothing to go on. And they weren’t going to do any of the legwork vis-à-vis “looking into it.” Instead, that was my job – tough because I don’t have any of the powers of a police officer. But, given the situation, I felt I had no choice but to be a good sport about it and play along.
However, my job of “investigating” the matter completely on my own with no help from policeman proved to be amazingly easy, with so many gay men seemingly eager to provide me with all sorts of incriminating statements in writing on the manhunt website which I ought to point out was rumored among the whole entire gay community to be NSA monitored. Soon, I was able to compile a report that included several statements implicating Eddie as involved in a whole bunch of unsavory characters, establishing a clear link between Eddie of the gym and my date rape drugging at Ramrod.
I soon was in a position to start writing a report, and I began working extensively with Daniel of the GMDVP and also consulted with the legal counsel as well, who in particular advised me that certain of Rawdog’s threats were important to include in any report I sent to the police, as they were sufficiently explicitly “direct threats” to me so that police theoretically could have threatened to charge him with a crime in order to compel further testimony.
When I felt I had gotten the report in good enough shape, I called up the sex crimes unit of the family justice center again, and this time spoke to a different policewoman. A much different type of woman who was white (not black) and very, very ladylike. She was very eager to see the report, however once she got it into her hands, things changed. She wanted to hold onto the report, and not allow me to file any criminal complaints. She refused to file a police report and gave me the runaround. At some point she tried to tell me that the statements people made to me in writing which I felt to be threatening were nothing of the sort. They were saying nothing in the least bit untoward, they were not doing anything to me, and if I thought so, I simply had mental problems, was delusional, and needed to seek psychiatric help.
At this point, let me do a gallery which shows a list of some of the statements people made to me which were included in the report, which this police woman concluded were nothing out of the ordinary.
GALLERY [WORK ON IT LATER].
In any case, I gave up trying to deal with her, but continued dealing with Daniel for awhile. However, the papertrail does start to show me “wising up” in a way, in particular with regard to this seeming requirement that I view Eddie as nothing but an innocent victim in the matter too.
On June 23, 2009, I write:
Dear Daniel,
I have had a realization of sorts. First of all, I now realize, Eddie has basically been going against me and spreading false rumors, at the gym, that I am crazy, just to discredit me should I, later on, decide to complain to his boss about how his connection with unsavory, off-the-wall criminal characters has harmed me. Even while he continued to be nice to me, probably more to placate me than anything else. I mean, he does like me a lot but he is not going to sacrifice these drug parties or offend a major supplier of drugs, and I've been blind and foolish and been protecting him even when he has been doing the opposite of protecting me. And my protecting him has been putting me in harms way.I mean, when those cops say my "theory" sounds off the wall and paranoid or delusional, well, actually it isn't. I'm just thinking of Eddie first and not saying those things (or not articulating it in a way) that would lend credibility to me. Which is to say, Eddie has had numerous drug problems throughout his adult life, gotten mixed up in numerous bizarre situations so bad and weird that, when I tell his friends about what happened to me, they tend to respond in a way that suggests that what happened to me is by no means an isolated occurrence in Eddie's life, but is more the norm, as bizarre as it is.
And then, by August 12, 2009, I wrote another email to Daniel which I would say indicated me further discarding the mask of feigned (or obedient) gullibility and moving in the direction of questioning people’s motives. Here I write:
Anyway, for now I think I would like to resolve the charges first so I can relax, then take my time to figure out how to convince the FBI to use my info to go after this prostitution ring. I realize my prior conversations with police were tainted by low self confidence on my part along with the fact that the police are work averse plus there is the political correctness factor.
Those gun toting ladies in the family justice center don't want to bust a prostitution ring in a manner that offends the pc police or contradicts established pc orthodoxy. E.g., straight white men are predators and abusers, women are victims, gay men are angels who are victims of the religious white and of coarse-mannered redneck homophobes, and even if they don't always treat each other perfectly, they give a lot of money to liberal causes so a blind eye must be turned to their antics. Besides which, anything that results in bad publicity about gays will offend the marriage equality people and other aspects of the gay political agenda, and gay activist are too well monied for these ladies to offend. Thus, going to these human trafficking and sexual assault ladies for help only results in me being treated like shit by them, the compassion centers of their brain being so obedient to the dictates of political correctness (you can tell, I am totally disgusted by this, however it is quite true that these ladies owe their jobs to the same liberal establishment that leeches off of gay $$$$$).
Anyway, the latest incident proves to me that this prostitution ring most definitely caters to pedophiles, which those two men in that Chandler inn hotel room who tried to plant drugs in my pocket on my way out definitely were. So I think I want to go to the FBI, but first do some networking with some concerned citizens and organizations. In particular, the mspcc -- mass society for the prevention of cruelty to children. Eventually, I want to do a better job of articulating my case, make sure I get a few people from that organization, as well as you, to familiarize yourself with the most relevant facts, and then agree to accompany me to a meeting with law enforcement to serve as moral support and also witnesses who will make sure the policemen don't merely blow me off. If they are forced to look into it, they will have no choice but to agree I have a credible case and they need to do something about it. But I can't go to them alone. I need political support.
We can talk about it next week.
Damian
Almost immediately after I wrote this email, Daniel was either fired or at least abruptly left the organization. And I was essentially excommunicated from the whole entire GMDVP and the rest of the family justice center simultaneously. I think, though, that the problem was that Daniel was willing to meet with me and sort of string me along and manipulate me, but the moment I start expecting something along the lines of official help from the organization, they had to stop keeping up appearances, officially excommunicate me, and then rely on crooked cops to try to take me down.
I just want to point out one other thing. Around the time of Pope Benedict’s resignation, someone tipped me off and told me that what was going on with me involved the Catholic Church, and suggested I look into it. How interesting that this resignation was accompanied by a Vatileaks scandal involving the “gay mafia” in the Catholic Church being blackmailed by outside influences, and according to an article in March of 2012, $1.5 billion dollars being mysteriously “laundered” or embezzled out of the Vatican Bank in the course of 18 months through an account set up in 2009.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/19/vatican-bank-idUSL6E8EJ1F920120319
I wish I could find out exactly when this account was set up, and when the money started flowing. Because, it would appear that my excommunication from the Family Justice Center seems to have coincided with exactly 18 months prior to this reuters article being written. In other words, once they got the report with enough evidence from me (which was what they wanted/needed) they could suddenly refuse to talk to me, and discard me like a soiled glove. And maybe that's when the money started flowing -- or, at least, when A LOT of money started flowing out of Vatican coffers more quickly than before.
Furthermore, my life following the excommunication from the Family Justice Center can only be characterized as a pattern of horrible abuse involving huge numbers of individuals from the gay community, combined with the involvement of many crooked cops as well, all appearing to be botched up frame ups where they appeared to be trying to take me down, failing, incriminating themselves in the process, and then trying it all over again.
Let me put it this way, suppose they were blackmailing the Catholic Church. Or blackmailing the gay mafia of the Catholic Church. Every amount of horrible abuse against me committed by gay guys of the Progressive Gay Scene, combined with crooked cops not only failing to help but joining in on and enabling the abuse, combined with botched frame ups and other obvious efforts to cover things up, could constitute a potential “area of scandal” which could be used as a tool to extract money from the Catholic Church. Furthermore, while the abuse had somewhat subsided prior to Pope Benedict’s resignation, it subsided much more after it, and now is pretty rare though I would still say I am regarded as a second class citizen by the gay community of Boston and surrounding areas.
Emails with Rawdog also indicate a certain amount of brainwashing. However, it’s like I was fed information consistent with and then brainwashed into believing in one scenario, then new people would come forward with new information that caused me to change my theory and come up with another one, usually with a certain amount of coaching and/or manipulation by others. So you end up with me changing my mind about what was behind it all three different times, leaving a sum total of three different theories that all seem to be a “cover story” hiding Catholic Church involvement.
Notice in the Rawdog emails (Feb 2009):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DfVTATXTucNUdpQThXdDFBRGs/edit?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DfVTATXTucOG1TWW9NYk5XWGc/edit?usp=sharing
I write that I have been collaborating with others, and if he wants to talk to them to get a second opinion or second set of eyes, he can.
And, in the case of Bitemenow (June 2010):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-DfVTATXTucYU5KcTBRYXNtTHc/edit?usp=sharing
you see me saying at the very end outright that I really oughtn't to be saying that I “know” a certain Stefano character was a closeted gay Italian mafia boss with pretend wife, because I have no proof of it, and it’s more that other people told me that or helped convince me of that.